3 ms·
Will chess.com provide an automated tool that uses the same methodology to analyse every player that uses it's platform? If not it seems unfair to other high p
by Valgrim 4y ago
Will chess.com provide an automated tool that uses the same methodology to analyse every player that uses it's platform?
If not it seems unfair to other high profile players.
But imagine they do, will those players get automatically banned from the website? Will tournaments require a proof of your online score and "non-cheater" certificate?
A part of me seems to see this kind of automated analysis dangerously intrusive. Another part of me sees a big monetization potential for the platform.
- StanislavPetrov 4y agoIf you play in tournaments for cash prizes your level of play demands a higher level of scrutiny.
- crystaln 4y agoSeems like an almost unsolvable problem long term as in online poker.
- slenk 4y agoMost players using their platform aren't making money from it?
- burnished 4y agoIt is a very manual process involving human experts. It is not an automatic process, which you would know if you read a couple pages of TFA
- davidblowie 4y agoTotally agree. They only show baselines for the metrics that don't matter, like "Strength gained during first 2.75 years after receiving 2465 ELO" or "Time Between Achieving 2500 Elo and 2700 Elo or Peak Rating". The most important metric is "Number of games flagged by our cheat detection system", and they don't show the baseline for that.