5 ms·
One time when they were 17. Obviously the sanction at 12 wasn't bad enough. A barring for 5 years would've maybe helped him learn his lesson
by selfmodruntime 4y ago
One time when they were 17. Obviously the sanction at 12 wasn't bad enough. A barring for 5 years would've maybe helped him learn his lesson
- Andrew_nenakhov 4y agoWhatever happened during online play on a second rate chess site is hardly a reason to ban player from OTB events without evidence of cheating in such events.
- Taek 4y agochess.com is a first rate entity in the chess world (a peer of FIDE and lichess), and Hans was caught cheating in events that had cash prizes. Hans cheated for money, that's plenty of indication that he would cheat in more important situations as well.
- Andrew_nenakhov 4y agoChess.com has no problem allowing Niemann to participate in tournaments after they allegedly 'caught' him, and they only became very principled after their business partner Carlsen had lost to Niemann and instigated the conflict in a very disingenuous way. In any court their testimony would be thrown out. Also, he allegedly cheated for money at 12yo. Yeah, right, that's definitely a grave unforgivable sin that should ruin his whole career. /s
- Taek 4y agoHe cheated in the 2020 cash prize tournent SCC Grand Prix at the age of 17. If you are going to be snarky, at least be correct.
- Andrew_nenakhov 4y ago*allegedly cheated. We are yet to see any conclusive proofs of it. There are no any proofs of him cheating in any of the OTB events he took part it.