4 ms·
Including Spring itself? Jokes aside, can't Clojure simply call whatever you want from the JVM?
by xapata 4y ago
Including Spring itself?
Jokes aside, can't Clojure simply call whatever you want from the JVM?
- dekelpilli 4y agoMaybe theoretically true (I'm not sure about the extent of the completeness), but definitely not practically true when it comes to annotation-driven-development frameworks such as Spring.
- xapata 4y agoAh. While objects have their uses, I think the Clojurist might prefer, well, closures. That's not to say one is better than the other, just that the Clojurist probably won't miss the style of the Spring framework.