4 ms·

I’m not sure what to make of your reply. You don’t offer any evidence that it’s not subjective. And I don’t even know what you mean by > Case closed, apologist

• smoldesu 4y ago
  > You don’t offer any evidence that it’s not subjective. Let me break it down for you, case-by-case: > Apple has the opportunity to standardize all of their devices under one serial/power connector This is objectively true. Apple helped design the USB-C standard to replace the ports on their own devices, and demonstrated this intent on the Macbook and later, the iPad. > they have neglected to do this for over a decade This is also true. While USB-C isn't a decade old, USB 3.0 is, and Apple has refused to update Lightning cables to reflect the newer standards in serial transfer technology. > it overtly effects the user experience. This is, undeniably and objectively, true. USB 2.0 is extremely slow - to the point that most users resort to slow wireless transfers to avoid an even slower wired one. Apple can fix this. They don't even need to get rid of USB-C to do this, but by switching to USB-C they will no longer have a choice. They had their opportunity to play fair, now they have to play by the rules instead. I'm closing the case because the EU has done so as well. Apple is negligent here, regardless of how Apple, their customers or other bystanders feel.