8 ms·
Why not?
by peterhunt 4y ago
Why not?
- bsaul 4y agoBecause that would be equivalent to saying « rdbms are fine as a kafka alternative provided you build a compensation mechanism for all the things it does worse than kafka». It doesn’t make any sense.
- andrewstuart 4y agoIdeology. There's alot of people who are ideologically opposed to database backed message queues. They're usually reluctant to give detailed explanations why, because it's an emotional thing.