3 ms·
Which shows ... I don't know ... naivety, or cockiness, or something. If I'm cheating at chess (or poker or whatever) online and I know that there are likely to
by FireBeyond 4y ago
Which shows ... I don't know ... naivety, or cockiness, or something. If I'm cheating at chess (or poker or whatever) online and I know that there are likely to be some form of anti-cheat scanning happening... why wouldn't you run your chess client on a computer beside you - then everything surrounding that is undetectable (processes, focus, CPU utilization, etc.)
- kuboble 4y agoBecause he likely wasn't aware they they track it and having this other computer introduces other risks. If he accidentally showed a picture of his second computer on the same desk during e.g. a stream it would be akin to guilt admission.
- williamcotton 4y agoCheating is a bad decision to begin with. I’m not surprised that further bad decisions were quickly in pursuit.
- bena 4y agoPeople are still rather short-sighted when it comes to what a computer can do. They can really only think in front of them. If I put information into this program, I get information out. They don't think that applications can monitor their own meta-state. Or the state of other applications. So I'm not terribly surprised that he thought running the engine in another browser window would have been sufficient. He might have even had it open in "incognito mode". And since it's incognito, it can't be detected, right?
- KennyBlanken 4y agoMost people don't realize that the online chat functions for a lot of customer service sites show every character you type, not when you hit 'enter' or 'send'.
- bambax 4y agoDidn't know that. Is this really true? What would be the point of it? When chatting with a customer support it's quite apparent the csr is involved in many chats at once; wouldn't it be quite taxing for them to have to monitor not just the responses but every keystroke of the people they interact with?
- permo-w 4y agothere are easily observed indications that websites can detect window focus. take facebook for example. if you get a notification while a facebook tab is open but not in focus, the tab title will irritatingly and eye-drawingly flash between "facebook" and "x messaged you" until you focus on the tab. or youtube. if you open a youtube video in the background it will not autoplay until you focus on that tab. these things are not hidden from the user
- yucky 4y agoEasily observed to people who know what to look for or how these things work. I'm sure a mechanic would scoff at how many "obvious signs" the average driver misses about potential problems with their vehicle.
- permo-w 4y agothese are things I’ve noticed without any experience of webdev beyond “here’s how html syntax works”
- yucky 4y ago>these are things I’ve noticed without any experience of webdev beyond “here’s how html syntax works” these are things I’ve noticed without any experience of autorepair beyond “here’s how internal combustion engines work” See what I mean? It's a bar that most people don't cross.
- permo-w 4y agoI kinda see what you’re saying, but I also really think that observing that websites often act differently when you’re not focused on them is a pretty standard-level observation to make even if you’re not a programmer also knowing how an internal combustion engine works is not equivalent to knowing that html code goes in angle braces. it’s more equivalent to knowing that you need to use a certain type of wrench when working on a certain type of car (I don’t know if this is actually true because I don’t know how to fix cars, but it’s more equivalent)