4 ms·
It's wonderful that there is a fork of SQLite. It's good to see new ideas. Is Airbus going to use it in the A350? No. Why not? It's not compliant with DO-178B
by chasil 4y ago
It's wonderful that there is a fork of SQLite. It's good to see new ideas.
Is Airbus going to use it in the A350? No.
Why not? It's not compliant with DO-178B, because it has not been confirmed correct with "Test Harness 3" (TH3).
- dathinab 4y agopeople are not annoyed by anyone forking SQLite they are annoyed by people misrepresenting facts in a subtle manipulative way to make their fork and the reasons around it look like something it isn't what the article intentionally or unintentionally conveys in its tone and formulation is: "sqlite is badly outdate beyond saving and needs to be replaced" what actually is the case: "we want something like SQLite but with some core changes incompatible with SQLites core principles which should be API compatible enough to allow reusing a lot of DB tooling".