3 ms·
Read the rest of the comments here. Everyone else is having similar problems. Also, please spare me the expected "This is all anecdotal/sample size of 30" follo
by cookiecaper 15y ago
Read the rest of the comments here. Everyone else is having similar problems. Also, please spare me the expected "This is all anecdotal/sample size of 30" follow-up. Perhaps you can answer the real question -- is this valuable to anyone if it has a significant error margin? I think it wouldn't be allowed a margin of more than 1% if it were to be useful, and even that is kind of pushing it if you intend to do anything important with the data -- if 20 sites are tested per visitor, a 1% error rate would mean that an incorrect detection would occur every fifth visitor or so. That's enough to allow plausible deniability in my book.
- futmacl 15y agoFWIW, I added several improvements, and according to the built-in survey, it works for about 95% of all visitors. If you had bad results initially, clear you cache and give it a second try.