4 ms·
Lightning was a design put forth by a company that wasn't Apple during the USB IF's design stage of USB-C. It was rejected because the pins were on the outside,
by DiabloD3 4y ago
Lightning was a design put forth by a company that wasn't Apple during the USB IF's design stage of USB-C. It was rejected because the pins were on the outside, not the inside, and would allow easy damage of both the cable and the connector. It was rejected purely on completely sane technical and mechanical reasons.
Apple shipped it anyways, and all Lightning cables have failed or will fail for exactly the reasons it was rejected. Apple chose the cable because of how easily it fails.
Lightning was never good, and Apple has a long history of fucking customers, period.
- virusduck 4y agoWhat world are you living in?
- thebruce87m 4y agoWhat on earth. Some people have an irrational hate for Apple that borders on a mental illness.
- ephimetheus 4y agoI’ve never had a single lightning cable fail ever since they switched to them.
- Jtsummers 4y ago> Lightning was a design put forth by a company that wasn't Apple during the USB IF's design stage of USB-C. Do you have some references for this? I had never heard of Lightning having been developed anywhere but at Apple and specifically for their iDevice line and a check on Wikipedia's Lightning connector page has no references to anything that can substantiate this claim. Either a great example of historical erasure, or you're making this up. TL;DR: Source?
- no_identd 4y ago"during" ≠ "as part of", so technically they're as-written right either way, albeit I do suspect they did mean "as part of", so, I'll second that source request