I don't see how historicity weakens the argument. The reality is that data can be used to your benefit or against you. Having more of it doesn't shift the bal

I don't see how historicity weakens the argument. The reality is that data can be used to your benefit or against you. Having more of it doesn't shift the balance one way or another. It just means there's more opportunities to take it one way or the other. Your times article also makes no mention of location tracking raising exoneration rates. It talks most prominently about how cheap faulty field drug tests contributed significantly to the improper convictions.