4 ms·
>Bell himself noted this weakness in using physical setting choices and argued that human ‘free will’ could be used rigorously to ensure unpredictability in Bel
by bumby 4y ago
>Bell himself noted this weakness in using physical setting choices and argued that human ‘free will’ could be used rigorously to ensure unpredictability in Bell tests
Please don't flame me if this is an outrageous question, because I readily admit I know nothing on the topic of quantum physics, but isn't it a quite large limitation to assume human free will as a given? Or is "free-will" meant as a proxy for "pseudo-random" and that's enough for this experiment?
- mdorazio 4y agoSee here: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1002780107 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1002780107 It has to do with true randomness in the measurement aspect, not with human free will.
- kgwgk 4y agoHow is “free will” different from the “freedom of choice” extensively discussed in that link - “as crucial as realism and locality in the derivation of Bell’s theorem”?