4 ms·
Of cause J. M. is right (since 2015) because of the facts of events (however, there is entire array of experts in international affairs from Oxford to Yale who
by goatsneez 4y ago
Of cause J. M. is right (since 2015) because of the facts of events (however, there is entire array of experts in international affairs from Oxford to Yale who wrote actual research papers on this. In fact even current CIA director remarked in his published notes consistent with J.M. explanation, or even longer memory is Z. Brzezinski's work). He predicted the response, he explain the causes of the response and they are indeed contained in the speeches of V.P., and he also predicted that this fiasco of diplomacy of both sides will not have a solution because diplomatic solutions can only present themselves at the intersection of understanding of each party's concerns in question.
West is trying to isolate, decimate, breakup and breakdown RU (and later also CHI). These are official goals of the West (total evil has to be totally annihilated is the phrase), stated explicitly in fact. This is clearly not a path to diplomacy, hence, escalation can only increase and Nuc.war is inevitable, inescapable and a logical end-result of this narrative the West has fallen into. It is just as paranoid attitude as that of RU.
- wsc981 4y ago> This is clearly not a path to diplomacy, hence, escalation can only increase and Nuc.war is inevitable, inescapable and a logical end-result of this narrative the West has fallen into. It is just as paranoid attitude as that of RU. I sincerely hope you are wrong, but I very much fear you are right.