3 ms·
That's just restating the problem in a single, flashy sentence.
by DiggyJohnson 4y ago
That's just restating the problem in a single, flashy sentence.
- chiefalchemist 4y agoNot really. The difference is, it's not giving credit where credit is *not* due. We have the same problem with the misuse of the words leader and journalist. Allowing violators to claim a respected title *that they don't deserve* only enables the problem. Put another way: if you pet barked, do you still call it a cat? The point is, a scientist does science. Fraud is not science. If you do fraud you no longer deserve the right to be called a scientist. Words matter.