11 ms·
> which it apparently doesn't. It doesn't, because after 50+ years of research, there is still no consensus on image quality.
by ska 4y ago
> which it apparently doesn't.
It doesn't, because after 50+ years of research, there is still no consensus on image quality.
- zebracanevra 4y agoEven though there's no consensus, there are a bunch of great metrics that are in use such as Butteraugli. I believe JPEG-XL uses it. In JXL the quality setting has been tuned especially well to give predictable speed/visual quality output. See Jon Sneyers's posts on twitter showing how quality variance is kept minimal: https://twitter.com/jonsneyers/status/1542560897306185729 https://twitter.com/jonsneyers/status/1542560897306185729