5 ms·
Or you’d end up with a lot of smaller publishers who can vouch for the content of their community to a single, meta-publisher. This is basically in-place alrea
by ajhurliman 4y ago
Or you’d end up with a lot of smaller publishers who can vouch for the content of their community to a single, meta-publisher.
This is basically in-place already, if your subreddit becomes toxic they ban it. And the moderators on each sub aren’t Reddit employees (for the most part).
Facebook has the same thing with groups and pages, individuals moderate it and FB bans it if it goes off the rails.
The logical next step would be trying to hold the page/ community owners legally liable for their content.
This new responsibility would imply ownership of the content, which would mean more ability to directly monetize it and possibly cut out the meta organizer (FB, Reddit, etc) by moving the community to another platform if there’s any friction.
Obviously the platforms don’t want a looser connection with their participants, they want all of the money and none of the responsibilities.