3 ms·
Given such an incredibly low probability of accidental failure, the burden of proof is shifted to the more extraordinary claim. So a better question would be, w
by hazmazlaz 4y ago
Given such an incredibly low probability of accidental failure, the burden of proof is shifted to the more extraordinary claim. So a better question would be, what's the proof that it wasn't sabotage?
- pGuitar 4y agoWhile probably true, it is nearly impossible to prove a negative.... i.e.: Give me a proof that God doesn't exist
- polishdude20 4y agoHow about the third possibility? Accident / Incompetence? https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/09/nordstream.html https://thelawdogfiles.com/2022/09/nordstream.html