> Choosing one person to have authority over others is definitely authoritarianism No it is not. This "argument" is getting a bit stupid. Authoritarianism is

> Choosing one person to have authority over others is definitely authoritarianism No it is not. This "argument" is getting a bit stupid. Authoritarianism is defined as a form of government of a state, so calling any leadership that word is just plain wrong. A company with a CEO is not "authoritarian".