2 ms·
To prove that, you will need a rigorous definition of what partisan means covering every situation and set of events and then Scotus will need to assess the who
by LatteLazy 4y ago
To prove that, you will need a rigorous definition of what partisan means covering every situation and set of events and then Scotus will need to assess the whole of a social media company to evaluate whether the standard is met. Also, you won't be allowed to chat with your family unless you can prove to the same definition that you're impartial as a group.
- fardo 4y agoOr, more likely, you can do what the supreme court has done in the past with the Roth test [1], argue “you know it when you see it”, and dodge the challenge of rigorously defining the topic while still allowing for some prosecutions to occur. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roth_v._United_States
- triceratops 4y ago"For my friends, anything. For my enemies, the law".
- LatteLazy 4y agoOf course, that just requires people to agree whether something is "patently obscene". Now get people to agree on whether something is fair in a political situation...