4 ms·
> I mean the "citation needed" part referred to humans naturally gravitating towards one man rule type systems. Yes, and I responded to that, because of that.
by nosianu 4y ago
> I mean the "citation needed" part referred to humans naturally gravitating towards one man rule type systems.
Yes, and I responded to that, because of that.
> Even today we really can't help ourselves electing presidents, mayors, deans, CEOs, chancellors, etc.
Uhm... if this is what you cite as evidence for authoritarianism then I really don't know what to say. Choosing leaders is not authoritarianism.
- moffkalast 4y agoChoosing one person to have authority over others is definitely authoritarianism in its most basic form. It's right there in the name. All society in existence is authoritarian to some extent, otherwise you just have chaos since nobody enforces the rule of law. Some are just far more than others.
- nosianu 4y ago> Choosing one person to have authority over others is definitely authoritarianism No it is not. This "argument" is getting a bit stupid. Authoritarianism is defined as a form of government of a state, so calling any leadership that word is just plain wrong. A company with a CEO is not "authoritarian".