4 ms·
It is not complete, but you're assuming that our current understanding of physics have major deficiencies where significant prior observations can be overturned
by Aperocky 4y ago
It is not complete, but you're assuming that our current understanding of physics have major deficiencies where significant prior observations can be overturned.
Even Newtonian physics 300 years ago largely remain the same, relativity complemented it and explained issues on edge cases. It did not completely overturn Newtonian Physics and gravity did not became repulsive instead of attractive.
- stevenhuang 4y agoThey need not be deficiencies. The discovery of more fundamental models may reveal dualities between our existing theories and new ones. These duals may show that our current models are accurate, but only to an extent, or don't apply in certain circumstances. It's hard to fathom, but with gaps to fill in our knowledge of the universe, we may let our imaginations run wild yet :').