4 ms·
The downside is they pivoted away from supporting running it yourself. The technology is certainly exciting but also changes the target demographic. I'm curious
by edude03 4y ago
The downside is they pivoted away from supporting running it yourself. The technology is certainly exciting but also changes the target demographic. I'm curious to see how it plays out
- TOMDM 4y agoSuch a shame, I had an ideal use case for a product I'm working on, but there's no way I'm shackling it to cloud vendors. Just not a good fit for this product. I really hope materialize eventually inspires something like it in the open source world.
- School-Cotton 4y agoMaterialize itself is under a BSL license that makes every commit automatically convert to open source four years after it lands.
- SamuelHu 4y agoPlease also take a look at https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave https://github.com/risingwavelabs/risingwave if you are looking for advanced streaming databases. It is under Apache License and also support on-prem deployment (docker, kubernetes) with full function set of distributed clustering, compute-storage disaggregation, etc.. Let me know if anything.
- TOMDM 4y agoThis might actually do what I needed! I'll keep it in mind for the future, thank you for making me aware.
- glogla 4y agoThat is a shame. I was thinking of possibly using it in our company, but there's no way we're onboarding another cloud next to AWS.
- ByAnyOtherName 4y agoIt's source-available...
- edude03 4y agoI'm not sure that 100% of the bits you'd need to run it are available, and even if they are it's unsupported, which for many businesses is a non starter