2 ms·

I agree. The whole thing sounds like "It should have worked but, for an unspecified reason, didn't." Unfortunately, I wouldn't be surprised if it never really

I agree. The whole thing sounds like "It should have worked but, for an unspecified reason, didn't." Unfortunately, I wouldn't be surprised if it never really comes out. Company proprietary information and all that.

toyg 15y ago
Aren't Canonical and CouchDB all open-sourcey, community-first etc etc etc? Then why the secrecy here? To me, it sounds like couchdb just failed to scale in a big way and revealing how would basically kill the project, so Canonical are trying to do the polite thing.