>“At the current time there is no consensus on what reproducibility is or should be.” This seems like an underrated part of it. The meaning of 70% is a bit unc

>“At the current time there is no consensus on what reproducibility is or should be.” This seems like an underrated part of it. The meaning of 70% is a bit unclear to me since the article didn't cite how many replication studies most have done. If most have done 10 replication studies and weren't able to replicate a component of it they would count towards the 70%. Given the quality of research in the social sciences I would suspect the issue is much more significant than that - but nonetheless a distorting way to report the stats IMO.