2 ms·
> Because that's what she would have had to know, his cards, and the next cards in the deck in order. She would only have to know that if it was an absolute re
by mod 4y ago
> Because that's what she would have had to know, his cards, and the next cards in the deck in order.
She would only have to know that if it was an absolute requirement that she wins the hand.
It's not--she can take a positive expectation, which includes a coin flip, and still be wildly profitable.
The outcome of the last two cards isn't overly important, just the state of the game when she committed $109,000.
> He has more outs
You've made a fundamental error here. He's the only one with outs, as outs refer to cards that will improve your hand to be the winner. She doesn't have outs, because her hand is better than his at every single point.
I think your points are reasonably well thought out, they're just missing some fundamental knowledge required to make any kind of valid determination.
- bena 4y ago> because her hand is better than his at every single point. That's the point that hits me every time. It really seems like his claim is that her cards are shit and the hands she can make are marginal at best and he put her all in. So that should tell her his hand is better and she should fold. But she doesn't, she calls. And from here that makes him believe she has a hand already. But she doesn't, she has Jack high. To his 8 high. So his hand isn't better, he's trying to not go to the river and have to find out if he actually has a hand. He's essentially lambasting her for also having nothing but less nothing than him. She chooses the wrench because, fuck him, that's why.