i mentioned a slew of ways she could be cheating. all you’re doing is begging for hard evidence without being able to defend or rationalize what happened. this

i mentioned a slew of ways she could be cheating. all you’re doing is begging for hard evidence without being able to defend or rationalize what happened. this isn’t a court of law. there’s no presumption of innocence. your responses indicate you’ve likely never played poker at a high level. you may have never even played in a casino. what basis do you have to defend this person? i don’t think anyone in poker who won a hand they played badly just offered to return the cash. that alone tells me everything. edit: someone also paid for her entry into this game and she’s an amateur playing with phil ivey and GMan. https://twitter.com/haralabob/status/1576643133583937537?s=20&t=OBF10B1z-F1SHWVryK0seA https://twitter.com/haralabob/status/1576643133583937537?s=2...