3 ms·
> You're asking for more than just evidence though, you're asking for concrete proof which is very different. There is neither of these, though. There is only
by joekrill 4y ago
> You're asking for more than just evidence though, you're asking for concrete proof which is very different.
There is neither of these, though. There is only people speculating that they MUST be cheating because they didn't behave exactly as they were expected to.
> By your standards I shouldn't be able to speak until we examine the coin directly [...]
I never made any such statement or made and indication of specific "standards".
We should absolutely look at the coin if it's behaving this way. But we can't just conjecture that it must be weighted with zero evidence of that.
- jstx1 4y ago> But we can't just conjecture that it must be weighted with zero evidence of that. I don't think any of the accusation that have been brought up in this thread have been with zero evidence. I think we have very different understanding of what's evidence and how much of it sufficient to speak up, and we're kind of talking past each other (the last part seems very likely).