4 ms·
My guess is they had some heuristic based on EDIDs, which are incredibly easy to spoof. https://smile.amazon.com/EVanlak-Passthrough-Generrtion-Eliminated-Thun
by GauntletWizard 4y ago
My guess is they had some heuristic based on EDIDs, which are incredibly easy to spoof.
https://smile.amazon.com/EVanlak-Passthrough-Generrtion-Eliminated-Thunderbolt/dp/B07YMTMMH5/ref=dp_fod_2?pd_rd_i=B07YMTMMH5&psc=1 https://smile.amazon.com/EVanlak-Passthrough-Generrtion-Elim...
- gmueckl 4y agoYes, but why would you go to these lengths? The purpose of the whole mechanism is to prevent accidental misdiagnosis based on an incorrectly interpreted X-ray image. This isn't DRM, just a safeguard against incorrect use of equipment.
- GauntletWizard 4y agoPeople are cheap and corrupt. The speed bump this presents is real, but minor, in the face of a couple medical shops looking to save $100/pop on a dozen monitors. I hope it's rare, but I think a persistent nag window ("Your display isn't calibrated and may not be accurate") is probably a better answer than refusing to work altogether, because it will be clear about the source of the problem and less likely to get nailed down.
- gmueckl 4y agoYou have to draw a line somewhere, I guess. As far as I remember, protections against accidental misuse and foreseeable abuse of a device are required in medical equipment. But malicious circumvention of protections or any kind of active tampering are a whole other category in my opinion.
- kaba0 4y agoMedical devices are insanely expensive (a CT scanner may reach a million dollars), you won’t risk $100 on such a small thing as a screen.