3 ms·
At the time of calling the all-in, she was more likely to lose. So she would also need to know the next cards to be played. It seems even less likely the house
by ScoobleDoodle 4y ago
At the time of calling the all-in, she was more likely to lose. So she would also need to know the next cards to be played. It seems even less likely the house or dealer are in on it. How would RFID know the top cards yet to come? They are still in the deck.
- jstx1 4y ago> At the time of calling the all-in, she was more likely to lose. This is based on the equity shown on the stream which takes into account the dead cards, if you only know the board and their hole cards, she has 54.55% equity. Either way she should call because she needs 40.3% equity to break even (109/(109+161)), any equity more than that is a call and she doesn't need to know what cards will come for that call to be profitable.
- late2part 4y agoTrue - but what a hero call if right!