4 ms·
Weird thing is she checked her hole cards during the hand. I guess it's possible to misread your hole cards twice but difficult to do. Giving the money back is
by gregw134 4y ago
Weird thing is she checked her hole cards during the hand. I guess it's possible to misread your hole cards twice but difficult to do.
Giving the money back is also a bad look.
The other odd thing is she's a very new player suddenly playing some of the biggest stakes in the world, and she's now won $100k in back to back appearances, while presumably making amateur mistakes like calling $130k with Jack high.
I agree there's no convincing evidence but it's enough to raise my suspicions.
- alasdair_ 4y ago>I guess it's possible to misread your hole cards twice but difficult to do. With TV cameras and thousands of people watching every tiny thing you do, for hundreds of thousands of dollars, I can buy it. I’ve been in televised card games before and it is so easy to make dumb mistakes just because of the pressure of the cameras and audience.
- noncoml 4y ago> Giving the money back is also a bad look. I wouldn’t read too much into this, it can be either. I’ve given back money during disputes just to avoid drama and because I was certain one way or another the money would come back to me anyway.
- girvo 4y agoHow in the world is giving money back a bad look. I swear some of the people here are working backwards from their already concluded “she’s a cheater” and twisting anything they can to fit it. It’s wild to see, as someone with zero stake in it either way, but a cheater would not give the money back when asked.