5 ms·
> You're looking at the Rust reference right? Not normative, as stated here[1], linked from the page you cite. [1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/index.htm
by topspin 4y ago
> You're looking at the Rust reference right?
Not normative, as stated here[1], linked from the page you cite.
[1] https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/index.html https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/index.html
- mustache_kimono 4y agoOkay? Do you think you have you quibbled enough? To be clear, I still think it's fine for Wedson to inform him even if the document is not a normative reference/specification? Even if these are just the expectations of API/Rust users?
- topspin 4y ago> the expectations of API/Rust users? Pointing out whatever those are is fine. Linus pointing out the expectations of the Linux kernel is fine too, and no amount of invoking fictional formalisms trumps them.
- mustache_kimono 4y agoI 100% agree. And if you read my comments you'd realize, I agree with Linus on the substance. I think the way he said it was dick-ish. That's it!