I broadly agree with the wider point he is making. And he is free to leave any association he wants. But isn't Dr Haidt jumping the gun? Surely a valid statemen

I broadly agree with the wider point he is making. And he is free to leave any association he wants. But isn't Dr Haidt jumping the gun? Surely a valid statement would be "this research is just research, it does advance "equality" or fight racism". Wouldn't such a statement on good quality research be much more effective to communicate the core point?