I read the article with the view that since some workplaces will never change, offering medically fragile workers some accommodation is useful. Her advice to th

I read the article with the view that since some workplaces will never change, offering medically fragile workers some accommodation is useful. Her advice to the writer to look to a better place also rang true with me - places that refuse to give up on crunching employee skulls under their boots deserve to lose good employees. I didn't see your previous reply but I want to say we're on the same page I think - WFH is a huge improvement to our quality of life and to the environment and any employer that wants good people and a high real rating on the E aspect of ESG had better keep this in mind.