4 ms·
Honest question, would a solid understanding of the open training data help? Having the art vocabulary down as well. In effect, knowing what is present and ho
by dopidopHN 4y ago
Honest question, would a solid understanding of the open training data help?
Having the art vocabulary down as well.
In effect, knowing what is present and how it’s tagged so you can « invoke » it more readily in the prompt-result.
Maybe I’m out of my depth. I know the corpus of tagged image used for training is enormous … but I still think that would help the user ( a prompt-crafter )
- jhbadger 4y agoI downloaded the vocab.json mentioned above and I think it helps. For example it explains why I can get SD to make pictures involving Einstein but not Feynman. Feynman simply isn't in the training set, but Einstein is.
- dopidopHN 4y agothanks for the follow up, that was my understanding but your example is telling. I will have to check myself. I tryed with minor success to have stable diffusion draw lesser know non-us personality. It always kind of work, but the palette is limited. For instance I tried charles de gaule and you get something that look like him. But he's depicted talking on a radio or waving his arm around like a politician. I tried to make him to grocery or play volley ball, it does not really work. While Michael jackson or Dennis Rodman get a way better treatment. edit : that vocab file is smaller than I thought. "De Gaule" is not in there but neither Einstein or feiman? I think I missing something. I Can find "obama", trump or Macron. Unclear about Michael Jackson. No beyonce or Denis Rodman. hmm weird, I had great result with all of them. Like.. recognizable details like tatoo or silly glasses.