It was RMS who "played the governance card" in the first place: > Emacs is not an independent project, and it isn't governed by its contributors. I'm the head

It was RMS who "played the governance card" in the first place: > Emacs is not an independent project, and it isn't governed by its contributors. I'm the head of the GNU Project, and that includes Emacs. > > You, as a contributor, can advocate a certain decision, which means you present arguments why I should approve it. I don't need to advocate a decision in that sense. > > I leave most technical decisions up to the contributors, including you, because for most of the questions I don't have any special preference of my own. For those questions, I'm happy with whatever works, and I know the contributors can figure out what works. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-03/msg00189.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-03/msg00...