Does he suggest software must be free? If you mean must as in, it should be illegal to do otherwise, I'm not sure. I don't think so, but given that he casts

Does he suggest software must be free? If you mean must as in, it should be illegal to do otherwise, I'm not sure. I don't think so, but given that he casts the conversation in terms of human rights, I can't entirely tell. But if you mean must as in, does he really think all software, without exception, should be free? Absolutely. I think that's clear from the linked article alone.