3 ms·
The same thing happens for Vincent van Gogh, and presumably others too.
by chris_overseas 4y ago
The same thing happens for Vincent van Gogh, and presumably others too.
- pessimizer 4y agoA good measure for whether you're more of a celebrity or an artist is how much of your face a google-image trained AI thinks belongs in your work.
- malikNF 4y agoWell what if the artist has a popular self portrait?
- pessimizer 4y agoSmoke comes out of the computer, and Captain Kirk notches another victory for humanity.
- kjeetgill 4y agoFrida Kahlo comes to mind.
- pmoriarty 4y agoShe's a rare exception in that she's mostly known for her self-portraits. Most other famous artists are mostly known for other things. Again, if the training data was labeled well enough, confusion about this sort of thing shouldn't happen.
- eru 4y agoEither labelled well, or you have enough data and a good enough algorithm so that the computer can figure it out.
- pmoriarty 4y ago> A good measure for whether you're more of a celebrity or an artist is how much of your face a google-image trained AI thinks belongs in your work. That this happens at all is evidence that the training data hasn't been curated, cleaned, or labeled well enough.
- swid 4y agoWhile it is the case the dataset isn’t well curated or perfectly labeled, it could just mean that grammar is not understood - the labels could be clear to a human, whether the image is a picture of Bob Ross or a painting by him. But the training misses that relationship. Even with poorly labeled data, I suspect AI will eventually figure out which labels are more likely to be poor and deal with it appropriately. In the reverse direction, you can try: A horse rides an astronaut And you will probably generate an astronaut riding a horse. It’s not a poor description of what we want; our assumptions about how grammar should work aren’t being honored.
- joosters 4y agoNot a problem with the Banksy images!