I'm pleased that this has been picked up and welcome your critique above. You're point about not fully understanding coffee is probably fair. I didn't sit down

I'm pleased that this has been picked up and welcome your critique above. You're point about not fully understanding coffee is probably fair. I didn't sit down and learn coffee before actually starting on this project and kind of picked it up as I went along. Most of my comments were about personal opinion and I think coffee could be extremely useful if learned and used appropriately. The syntax thing is more relating to the function vs -> points. By not putting "function" in a different color, I find it difficult to see where functions start. The Ternary operator example, is indeed typo, missing line break. It was supposed to read x = true x? "Badger" : "Fish" The points in the original post were my experiences with coffee and I hope to be able to use coffee in the future, but until I figure out the issue with closures and the language becomes more mature and has decent debugging tools, I'll stick to plain ol' JS. Original Author