I dont consider it a right, I only recognize negative rights as valid natural rights. They may have the legal authority to control it, and may have the legal a

I dont consider it a right, I only recognize negative rights as valid natural rights. They may have the legal authority to control it, and may have the legal authority to use government guns to prevent unauthorized copying, but they do not have the moral or ethical right. You must reject natural rights in favor of "who ever have the most guns has the right" method to definition of rights