The way I read it was he was removing himself from an organization, not from academia entirely. This particular organization wants to follow the antiracist lin

The way I read it was he was removing himself from an organization, not from academia entirely. This particular organization wants to follow the antiracist line of thinking, and they probably feel that strengthens their community. He's perfectly entitled to leave it and complain about it. But, the organizations reasons for making people who join the organization align with this values statement seems like it should be their prerogative. Maybe they feel like to grow as an organization, they need to ask their community to that line of thinking. If they have done the work to understand that's what they should do, isn't it correct, even if they lose a researcher like Haidt?