2 ms·

That doesn't mean that there is no value in the original work. It just shows that you are ignorant of the photographers work. That's not meant to be derogatory,

by sbuk 4y ago

That doesn't mean that there is no value in the original work. It just shows that you are ignorant of the photographers work. That's not meant to be derogatory, just a simple fact. Doesn't change that Warhol should have sought permission either.

lelanthran 4y ago
> That doesn't mean that there is no value in the original work. That's not a claim anyone is making.
- tiahura 4y ago
  The claim is that it’s fair use because they recognize Warhol’s style. That doesn’t seem like a good test for fair use.
- sbuk 4y ago
  > "The source photo for the work was just another photo of Prince." Sounds pretty dismissive of the original photo's value to me...