3 ms·
Thanks for your thoughtful reply. It is possible to be simultaneously cautious and proud of one's children for quick adaptation, but it is far from common. In
by nonrandomstring 4y ago
Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
It is possible to be simultaneously cautious and proud of one's
children for quick adaptation, but it is far from common. In fact it's
rare in my observation, and the pride is misplaced.
These "straw parents" are very real and embodied. I talk to them often
through Digital Self Defence classes and have a first hand feel for
their struggles (while also being a parent myself).
> Understanding the technology and understanding its attendant risks
aren't [s] completely orthogonal, but neither does one imply the
other
This is a very interesting point you make. My opinion is that they are
very much orthogonal right now, and that is a major problem. Much of
what passes for "understanding" is shallow marketing hype, at best
dangerously incomplete, but more typically misleading, deception and
propaganda. I quite agree with comedian Stuart Lee's assessment of
Vodafone's guide to online child safety as "Mr. Fox's Guide to
Hen-house Security".
We are in desperate need of a renaissance in digital literacy. I have
called for Digital Literacy 2.0 as a movement to repair much of the
cavalier and avoidant half-arsed education around technology these
past 30 years.
Despite the likelihood that the implementation will be a shitshow -
regressive for many necessary forms of speech to challenge
technofascism - in the UK our "Online Safety Bill" contains much good
stuff in the margins and has my broad support.
I get the sense that you are neither defending bad technology nor bad
parenting. But together these the things feed off each other - and the
results are self-evident in depressed, suicidal, distracted states of
anxious acedia and nihilism so many children suffer today, along with
the frustration and confusion of parents who feel their children
"need" to engage in technologies and habits that are clearly harmful
to them.
EDIT: My main point stands though - that ot is unacceptable for
parents to transfer the burden of responsibility to their children.
That is neglect, however you frame the abilities and knowledge of the
parties.
respects