This comment doesn't really explain the conflict, if it was a response to the ELI5 request. Instead it seems to be at best discounting that there is a conflct

This comment doesn't really explain the conflict, if it was a response to the ELI5 request. Instead it seems to be at best discounting that there is a conflct to explain or at worse is participating in the conflict by defending one side of it. I think a stronger case could in theory be made that the conflict is non existent but it's a harder position to advocate.