3 ms·
But the valuable energy density of nuclear doesn’t have a combustion equivalent, right? Only explosions or slow burns.
by dr_dshiv 4y ago
But the valuable energy density of nuclear doesn’t have a combustion equivalent, right? Only explosions or slow burns.
- numpad0 4y agoI believe nuclear “explosions” are slow burns too, just a sun in Earth’s atmosphere out of nowhere has to cause explosion-like phenomena, and equivalence with chemical explosion can be established. In vacuum it will be just a molten ball. This one uses continuously happening detonation along a circular path, and has little to do with those.