3 ms·
Or not. Russia will use a nuke, or several, and won't achieve much. Then the effect will be the opposite of what they expect. It will become a pariah state, th
by credit_guy 4y ago
Or not.
Russia will use a nuke, or several, and won't achieve much. Then the effect will be the opposite of what they expect. It will become a pariah state, think North Korea, but times ten. And there won't be gains on the battlefront to justify the international excommunication.
Other dictators contemplating the use of nukes will learn a lesson.
But, yes, most likely Russia will use a nuke, unfortunately.
- rtwrtwer54 4y agoI think tacticals will work surprisingly well, just the opposite of using tanks without air support. The world maybe horrified at seeing a couple nukes blowing in the middle of a field, but tactics could end using very effectively a bomb that can clean a couple of square km. in one sweep. The low-yield thing just add an icing to the cake; you can swifly move ahead your own army almost just after the nuke has went off, without waiting for a deadly fallout ends in a couple of days. And think about this: the enemy has no nukes and there's no way to stop the nukes. The battlefield has not seen this kind of radical strategic advantage since the invention of the tank.
- rapjr9 4y agoWhat range of EMP effect can you get from a tactical nuke lofted to the height a howitzer can send it?
- DoItToMe81 4y agoRussia will not use a nuke.