3 ms·
Every acquisition over $100m should automatically trigger a review, especially if said company is a "leader" in ANY market, and looked at from the perspective o
by mtgx 4y ago
Every acquisition over $100m should automatically trigger a review, especially if said company is a "leader" in ANY market, and looked at from the perspective of:
"Is the company removing this competitor from the market hurting competition in their own market in the long term?"
It's way better for the market to let the cash-rich large corporations attempt to develop their own competitor to a new threat they might see in the market than to allow them to buy that competitor.
It would've been better for us if Instagram was never bought by Facebook, Admob never bought by Google, and so on.
Sure, maybe they wouldn't have gotten quite as successful on their own, but for one perhaps Facebook wouldn't have become as strong as it became in the social media space (a good thing) or they would've been forced to create a NEW competitor, and we all benefit from more competitors in the market. Instead they removed one and made themselves even more powerful.
- dnissley 4y agoIt would've been better for us if Instagram was never bought by Facebook, Admob never bought by Google, and so on. What makes you think that?
- birdyrooster 4y agoOligopolies are bad, competition is good or something
- ethbr0 4y agoBecause the essential feature of very large companies is their attempting to create a market where they can invest as little as possible and continue to extract revenue.