4 ms·
>It happened to art and I don’t see why devs think they’re immune. Probably because it's a different problem domain that actually requires precision and the re
by trention 4y ago
>It happened to art and I don’t see why devs think they’re immune.
Probably because it's a different problem domain that actually requires precision and the requirements often are unexpressable in natural language.
Also, it has not happened in art. You can say it has happened in art when 50% of currently salaried graphic artists are unemployed.
- whywhywhywhy 4y ago>actually requires precision and the requirements often are unexpressable in natural language Same sentence could describe art.
- trention 4y agoThe first part couldn't and the second doesn't apply to the current (and I suspect any future) mechanism AI models use to generate...anything.
- astrange 4y ago> Also, it has not happened in art. You can say it has happened in art when 50% of currently salaried graphic artists are unemployed. It’s barely happened to anyone. There isn’t a general pattern of automation replacing jobs, so it’s not a reasonable thing to assume will happen. Automation replaces tasks and makes things cheaper, both of which make jobs more productive and more worth keeping.