7 ms·
Judging from the comments on his website, it sounds like everybody and their grandma hates GoDaddy. I've recently been looking into getting a domain name and st
by ImprovedSilence 15y ago
Judging from the comments on his website, it sounds like everybody and their grandma hates GoDaddy. I've recently been looking into getting a domain name and starting a website, can anyone point me towards a more reputable site to acquire a domain and host a site? (Yeah, I know, I read HN daily, and I'm still clueless when it comes to actually putting up a website)
- tdoggette 15y agoNameCheap is good.
- nicwest 15y agosecond that, been using them for the better part of decade, never any problems.
- sunchild 15y agoMe too. No issues after many years of namecheap.
- hornbaker 15y agoAnother vote for NameCheap. Have had ~50 domains with them for nearly 5 years now, never a problem.
- dctoedt 15y ago+1 for NameCheap. (Not to beat a dead horse, but back when we could see the karma numbers for comments, it was possible to visibly "second" an endorsement comment by upvoting it, instead of posting separate +1 comments like this one ...)
- mikeleeorg 15y agoAnother vote for NameCheap. And to make this comment more useful... I especially love how easy it is to transfer domain names between NameCheap users. I had purchased a domain name once with my personal account. Then I created a company and wanted the domain to be officially owned by that entity and not me. So I created another NameCheap account for that company, then transferred it over very easily. Of course, it's possible other registrars offer such a frictionless transfer process between account holders too. I've only used NameCheap for this and can say I was pleased with the results.
- peeplaja 15y ago+1 for namecheap
- mluggy 15y agoAlso loving namecheap thought it sucks that they don't support all extensions, for example I have sampl.es which I cannot transfer from GoDaddy
- icebraining 15y agoSame here, although I've only been a customer for two years. Never had any problems with their website either, always fast and responsive.
- JeremyBanks 15y agoJust to throw in a slightly differing opinion: I've been with Namecheap more than five years, and overall I've been very satisfied with them. However, I have had a couple of minor issues. Most recently, when making a minor change their support messed up something with my domain. They were slow to respond to my request that they fix it, and seemed far too confused about what was going on. The domain in question wasn't important to me, but if it had been I'd have been pretty pissed.
- lhnn 15y agoname.com has been pretty good for me for the past few months. Very easy to use. Also: Don't get a .com/.net domain name. You don't want the US government declaring your domain to be evil and taking it off the 'net.
- bmj 15y agoWait, I thought .com/.net (among others) were generic TLDs governed by ICANN? I would assume .us might fall into this warning (as would other country code TLDs), but .com and .net?
- eli 15y agohttp://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2451302 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2451302
- bmj 15y agoThanks. I still have a question, though: if the FBI can seize these domain names, does that mean they can seize any domain names? I'm a little fuzzy on the control/management scheme here.
- uxp 15y agoAs anyone has said elsewhere in this thread, all they are doing is strongarming the administrators of the TLDs that operate primary offices inside the USA to alter the DNS entries for specified domains they feel are being used to break the law, because that is their jurisdiction, and prevent the owner from being able to change it back. One of the more controversial parts of SOPA is the ability of ICE/Customs to be able to "un-resolve" domain names under other TLDs and country codes. Since the USA does not have jurisdiction over Russia (as an example), there is no current way to block a filesharing or spammer operating with a .ru address without having a partnership with Russia. This aspect of SOPA would allow the USA Government to block all domain name servers from resolving that address properly, by basically poisoning the legitimate DNS entry with one that resolves to some landing page operated by ICE. They won't be able to seize the domain, but they'll make it just as worthless to anyone inside the USA.
- muraiki 15y agoI've used Dreamhost for years. They really work for their customers. Over time you accumulate points that you can use to vote for new features (which I just realized, I have never done... so I should have a decent amount by now!)
- Cyranix 15y agoDreamhost is definitely fantastic for customer support, but after a recent email exchange, I learned that they don't have a timeline for when they'll upgrade their password system, which does not use one-way hashes. Password reminder emails contain the password in plaintext. If you're reading this thread and are concerned about domain security, I'd suggest looking somewhere other than Dreamhost for the time being.
- jacktoole1 15y agoI just recently found out that dream host stores it's passwords in plaintext! I'll probably be looking to transfer away from this simply for that reason. If you haven't set your panel security to use email confirmation to let new IP addresses log in, I would strongly recommend it.
- muraiki 15y agoWow, that's horrible. I wasn't aware of that. I use them for hosting but I use Google Apps for email. I'm sorry for making a bad recommendation.
- TorbjornLunde 15y agoWhen I researched what domain provider to use this summer I found many good words about EasyDNS. I’ve only used them a half year, but I am really happy so far.
- irons 15y agoI love EasyDNS for domain hosting. I can't quite bring myself to use the same company for DNS hosting and registration; I've used Dotster as a registrar since the 90's. You couldn't pay me to use huge, inept outfits like GoDaddy or Dreamhost who compete primarily on price. I have a similar, though evidence-free aversion to companies which put words like "cheap" in their name.
- ImprovedSilence 15y agoIs there a reason you avoid using the same company for hosting and registration?
- TillE 15y agoNamecheap is a pretty terrible name, and their site doesn't look great either. Still, the service is solid. Add me (five years, a handful of domains) to the list of satisfied users here.
- mattcofer 15y agoI have used Dotster for quite a few years also. I have zero complaints with them.
- premchai21 15y agoOne thing to note about EasyDNS is that last I checked, glue updates require human intervention, and IPv6 glue is a good way to confuse the humans on the other side of the support channel. If you don't use glueful delegations, then you probably don't care, but this is the sort of thing that's harder to tell upfront.
- courtewing 15y agoI recently switched over all of my domains from godaddy to hover.com, and I have been pretty happy with them.
- danielhunt 15y agoThis may not be suitable for everyone, but I've been recommending Blacknight ( http://www.blacknight.com/ http://www.blacknight.com/ , affiliate linkage: http://tracking.blacknight.com/aff_c?offer_id=5&aff_id=67&source=Hackernews http://tracking.blacknight.com/aff_c?offer_id=5&aff_id=6... ) for quite some time. They're an Irish hosting and domain name provider, and have a great name, a great support team and are a genuinely pleasant company to deal with. (Disclaimer: I don't work for them, but do know 1 or 2 employees there. Also, I pasted my affilate link above) edit grammar
- alanmeaney 15y agoI've used Blacknight.com for over 3 years and have found them very responive
- FraaJad 15y agoGandi.net
- JoshTriplett 15y agoSeconding the recommendation for gandi. They have very strong policies in favor of the domain owner. They also provide nice services such as email hosting for your domain. I use their server hosting as well, which works quite well, though not fast. Also, they support quite a few good causes (https://www.gandi.net/supports/ https://www.gandi.net/supports/); they fund Debian's DebConf every year.
- gujk 15y agoOne flaw with Gandi's mail feature is that new accounts do not get wildcard accounts (forward all @example.com mail to.one address): you need to register each email address you want individually. Apparently they couldn't handle spam filtering.
- marquis 15y agoEasy enough to move to Google Apps and use their wildcard option.
- charliesome 15y agoI'm usually a tight arse but in the case of gandi.net, I have no problem paying a premium so I don't have to put up with all the bullshit that customers of other registrars have to put up with
- rpicard 15y agoI've never had a problem with Name.com.
- shiftpgdn 15y agoI have been using NixiHost.com for a few years without issue.
- eli 15y agonamecheap.com is good if you're looking for something cheap (e.g. you've got 50 domains to register). Gandi.net is great if you don't mind spending $15 per domain.
- trustfundbaby 15y ago1and1 might not be popular here, but they're pretty cheap ($8.99 for .com), they have sales regularly and they throw in private whois info for free, plus your domain is locked down by default so the sort of thing described in the OP shouldn't happen. Never had a problem with them in almost 5 years.
- russell 15y agoLikewise, I've had a good experience with 1and1 for something approaching a decade. My GF and I have a couple dozen domains. Whenever she has a new creative idea, she gets a new domain.
- damptrousers 15y ago1and1 is a terrible. Please do not listen to individual accounts of 'no problems'. If you do have a problem, you will be in trouble. 1and1 is a giant company that makes money by quantity, not quality. In other words, the majority will have no problem, so let's have millions of customers and screw those that have problems. Again, there's too many other good companies to use such a crappy company.
- mikeleeorg 15y agoI've used them and didn't have a problem until I wanted to transfer to another domain registar. After painfully trying to find the transfer auth code and transferring the domain name, 1and1 continued to bill me for a couple of months. To their credit, they reversed the charges after I called them - but that didn't leave me with a satisfactory experience. I can understand why a company might want to make it painful to leave their service, but continuing to bill me points to either incompetence (some bugs in their billing system) or a malicious act (doubt it though). But otherwise, yea, a nice & cheap service.
- SkyMarshal 15y agoOne problem with 1and1 is that when your domains are about to be autorenewed, you don't get an email notification till the day of. I prefer registrars that give a few weeks heads up on that so I can cancel the autorenew if I want to let the domain expire (even GoDaddy gives advance notice).
- paisible 15y agoI've tried a few, have to recommend internetbs.net The website might seem pretty crappy, but they have really good customer support, plus the best API I've found. If you're looking to register domain names programmatically, definitely check them out.
- ricardobeat 15y agoI've used and trust http://nfshost.com/ http://nfshost.com/ and http://asmallorange.com/ http://asmallorange.com/ Big ones like MediaTemple and RackSpace seem good too. I used 101domain for international TLDs, not pretty but everything is going fine.
- Lammy 15y agoI can second Nearlyfreespeech. They've been great as my registrar and DNS host for years. I host on http://prgmr.com http://prgmr.com VPS.
- jdpage 15y agoPlus one for Nearlyfreespeech. Their shared hosting is pretty nice as well, except for the fact that they don't have mod_wsgi.
- Legion 15y agoNearlyFreeSpeech is wonderful. I drive people to them whenever I can. Along with being trustworthy and protective of their customers, their web panel is simple and no BS. I don't know how people put up with other registrars with their upsell-threw-up-all-over-the-page web panels. Even "good" ones like NameCheap are eyesores. I hope NFS never lets me down, because I talk them up like they walk on water.
- davidhansen 15y agoWe use Network Solutions as our registrar for our "valued" domain names, and name.com or godaddy for everything else. NetSol provides pretty good validation and security options for so-called "VIP" customers, but it's not perfect. The next step up is paying exorbitant fees to a company like MarkMonitor for domain name management services. This is what the "big boys" tend to do.
- ecaron 15y agoIs NetSol still "reserving" any domain name that you search on their site (http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/network-solutions-steals-domain-ideas-confirmed/ http://blog.domaintools.com/2008/01/network-solutions-steals...)? I swore I'd never go back there after that practice - and fortunately there are still enough better alternatives that I don't plan on it.
- jtap 15y agoThought I'd mention softsyshosting.com. I've used them for a small IIS website, dataintegrationagent.com. Site setup was easier, and quicker than godaddy.com. They were also quick to answer my questions. I found that it was pretty difficult to find a place to host IIS websites, and I really recommend softsyshosting if your planing on using anything IIS related.
- stock_toaster 15y agoI use dynadot as a registrar (couple of years). They have been good. Never used them for hosting actual sites though. I used markmonitor at a previous gig (requirement of a parent company) and they were good, but a bit expensive.
- grabble 15y agoNamespro.ca have excellent service and "not bad" prices. Highly recommended. P.S. And yes, I despise GoDaddy with every molecule of my being.
- protomyth 15y agoI've been using Domain Discover and I haven't had any problems.
- zaphar 15y agoI use dyndns for both the registration and dns serving. They've always been good to me.
- xyzzyb 15y agoHover.com is awesome and they have actual friendly, knowledgable humans that answer the phone.