4 ms·
could it be related to this: "After a series of one-sided hearings, luxury goods maker Chanel has won recent court orders against hundreds of websites traffick
by masenf 15y ago
could it be related to this:
"After a series of one-sided hearings, luxury goods maker Chanel has won recent court orders against hundreds of websites trafficking in counterfeit luxury goods. A federal judge in Nevada has agreed that Chanel can seize the domain names in question and transfer them all to US-based registrar GoDaddy. The judge also ordered "all Internet search engines" and "all social media websites"—explicitly naming Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Bing, Yahoo, and Google—to "de-index" the domain names and to remove them from any search results."
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/us-judge-orders-hundreds-of-sites-de-indexed-from-google-twitter-bing-facebook.ars http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/11/us-judge-ord...
- nknight 15y agoYou think Chanel cares about a web design website called CSS-Tricks?
- cube13 15y agoExcept... the domain was transferred AWAY from GoDaddy.
- billpatrianakos 15y agoAbsolutely not related. I truly hope you made this comment out of pure and sincere ignorance. This isn't a story about rights being trampled on no matter how hard anyone may try to frame it that way. This is just another case of someone getting their email broken into and the byproducts of that break in which in this case was a stolen domain.