This post only reinforces the original accusation. If you read between the lines, it looks like somehow Fedora was allowed not to "comply with the law", then IB

This post only reinforces the original accusation. If you read between the lines, it looks like somehow Fedora was allowed not to "comply with the law", then IBM took over Red Hat and they are afraid someone will sue IBM over Linux again. That's fair, of course, but it's hard to say the distro is "community driven". Also, why should it be? The whole point of Fedora, from the point of Red Hat (before the split into Fedora and RHEL) was to use the community to test features that would end up in RHEL. Why should they outsource control over the project to someone else? It makes no business sense. They maintain the distro, many outside volunteers help, too, but it's clear who makes crucial decisions.