I also think banning free choice in shop by regulation is proper saving lives by gradually limiting toxic to human body carbohydrates in food to safest & health

I also think banning free choice in shop by regulation is proper saving lives by gradually limiting toxic to human body carbohydrates in food to safest & healthiest level of zero... just after banning me option to buy healthiest human food and my daily meal - meat replacing it with cancerous plant-oil replacement. The safest roads - these where all people drive glass cars or tanks. Regulations as everything should also be decentralised & deglobalised. You don't like law? Go to the region with a different laws restrictions or none. But nobody wants promoting invasion of one option on other making it an authoritarian default. Seatbelts in 99% cases helps in 1% damages you including burning up alive. With full freedom you learn responsibility & create organic institutions to educate others & learn choosing good over bad. When you limit freedom you push people into state of mental disability to evaluate reality on their own & dependency on centralised arbiter. Leaving slave mentality & jump starting own brain takes a while. Often requires generational replacement. I'm all in for full information and detailed labelling, state institutions with objective studies & product stamping. But never for any choice limitation. I want to choose the filters, with option of none, not being forced to use one. I also want democracy with personal voting on each regulation & not being forced to vote for this or that package of things coerced into blindly accepting bulk of things attached to one thing i actually care about to change. Internet supposed to add to our regularly limited choices. What's it's feature and it's curse.